The antitrust class action initiated in Michigan against Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan has been deemed a “case to watch” by reports as the trial, which is scheduled to begin next year, will offer a rare legal analysis into the effects of so-called most-favored-nation clauses. The lawsuit alleges that BCBS broke antitrust law through such clauses in its contracts, as the agreements ensured that hospitals did not pay more to BCBS competitors. The agreements are gradually becoming outlawed in various states; North Carolina was the latest state to deem the provisions illegal earlier this month. Despite legislative action against the contractual clauses, rarely have they been tested in a court of law. The class action is seeking unspecified damages to compensate for alleged overcharges for consumers as a result of the clauses.
Full Content: Thomson Reuters
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Redfin Settles $9.2M Commission Inflation Lawsuits
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
DOJ Supports Colorado’s Efforts to Block Kroger-Albertsons Merger
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
Japan Considers Regulation of AI Developers
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
European Commission Extends Decision Deadline for Ita-Lufthansa Merger
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
UK, US and Australia Sanction Senior Leader of LockBit Cybercrime Gang
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI