A PYMNTS Company

US: Consumers dealt loss in Apple app legal riff

By  |  December 3, 2013

A US district judge ruled Monday to dismiss antitrust charges brought against Apple Inc. over its smartphone application monopoly, dealing a blow to consumers who claimed the company passed on millions of dollars thanks to its pricing policies.

    Get the Full Story

    Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

    yesSubscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

    By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

    Consumers filed the complaint against Apple claiming the company’s practice of keeping 30 percent of funds from app purchases created by independent developers transferred millions in extra costs for app buyers.

    But US District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers disagreed and dismissed the charges, ruling that the excess costs were placed onto consumers by the independent developers and not Apple. An attorney for the app buyers said he plans to appeal the decision to a federal appeals court in San Francisco.

    That appeals court previously ruled that consumers can bring antitrust lawsuits, which allowed app buyers to bring their own case against Apple.

    According to the buyers’ lawyer, Alexander Schmidt, “a consumer that buys a monopoly-priced product direction from a monopolist is a direct purchaser” and therefore the fees charged to consumers are transferred to them by Apple.

    Full Content: Bloomberg

    Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.