As news broke this week that the US International Trade Commission has sided with Samsung, the tech giant that accused Apple Inc. of infringing on its patents with the iPhone 4, the major question now remains of whether President Barack Obama will let the ruling – which bans imports of the iPhone 4, as well as other older models of the iPhone and iPad, into the US – stick, or if he will veto it. According to reports, the decision by the International Trade Commission is particularly troublesome, as Congress has previously come to the consensus that standard essential patent holders like Samsung should not be able to seek important bans from the ICT and violate their promise to license those patents under FRAND terms. The ICT’s decision also comes in the same week President Obama announced patent reform proposals.
Featured News
As Congress Considers a Ban On State AI Regs, California and NY Forge Ahead
Jun 19, 2025 by
CPI
Canada Watchdog Calls for Easing Foreign Investment Rules in Airline Sector
Jun 19, 2025 by
CPI
Litigation Finance Battle Heats Up in Tyson Foods Price-Fixing Case
Jun 19, 2025 by
CPI
Spain Weighs Additional Conditions on BBVA’s Hostile Bid for Sabadell
Jun 19, 2025 by
CPI
Japan’s TDK Buys SoftEye to Strengthen Smart Glasses Capabilities
Jun 19, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Theories of Harm
Jun 17, 2025 by
CPI
What Do We Mean by Harm to the Competitive Process?
Jun 17, 2025 by
Sean Sullivan
Is There a Better Approach to Vertical Merger Analysis?
Jun 17, 2025 by
Bob Majure & Andrew Sfekas
California’s Ill-Advised Turn Toward Europeanized Theories of Harm For Single-Firm Conduct
Jun 17, 2025 by
Geoffrey Manne, Dirk Auer & Brian Albrecht
EU Competition Policy in Support of Democracy and Sustainability: What Theories of Harm When Moving Away From the Predominance of the Consumer Welfare Paradigm?
Jun 17, 2025 by
Marios C. Iacovides