As news broke this week that the US International Trade Commission has sided with Samsung, the tech giant that accused Apple Inc. of infringing on its patents with the iPhone 4, the major question now remains of whether President Barack Obama will let the ruling – which bans imports of the iPhone 4, as well as other older models of the iPhone and iPad, into the US – stick, or if he will veto it. According to reports, the decision by the International Trade Commission is particularly troublesome, as Congress has previously come to the consensus that standard essential patent holders like Samsung should not be able to seek important bans from the ICT and violate their promise to license those patents under FRAND terms. The ICT’s decision also comes in the same week President Obama announced patent reform proposals.
Featured News
SAP Proposes Concessions to Resolve EU Antitrust Probe
Nov 16, 2025 by
CPI
Google’s Final Appeal in Ad Tech Antitrust Case Pushed to Late November
Nov 16, 2025 by
CPI
German Court Hits Google With €572 Million Damages Over Market Abuse
Nov 16, 2025 by
CPI
China Unveils Draft Antitrust Guidance for Internet Platforms
Nov 16, 2025 by
CPI
Google Submits Plan to Address EU Adtech Antitrust Violations
Nov 16, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Entertainment & Culture
Nov 13, 2025 by
CPI
Non-Playable Character: Competition Law Enforcement in the Video Game Market
Nov 13, 2025 by
Robin S. Crauthers
Gerrymandering Sports Entertainment Product Markets
Nov 13, 2025 by
Jodi Balsam
Redistribution via Competition Policy: A Case Study of Creative Industries
Nov 13, 2025 by
Friso Bostoen
Sports Governing Bodies vs. Antitrust 0 – 4? Sport and Competition Economics Comments on the Recent Judgements of the European Court of Justice
Nov 13, 2025 by
Oliver Budzinski