Five book publishers, who previously settled with the US Department of Justice over allegations of price-fixing e-books in conspiracy with Apple Inc., have filed an objection against the DOJ’s ruling that requires Apple to sever business ties with the publishers. The DOJ wants Apple to nullify the agency model used with the publishers, but the companies, including Penguin and Macmillan, claim such sanctions would violate the settlements made with authorities before the lawsuit against Apple began. The motion was filed on Wednesday in Manhattan. The publishers said the DOJ’s punishment would deprive “each publisher of the benefit of its bargain” with regulators. A hearing was scheduled for Friday to decide whether the court will adopt the remedies proposed by the DOJ, along with 33 states and territories. US District Judge Denise Cote found last month that Apple had conspired to fix e-books prices with the publishers.
Featured News
Federal Court Narrows Turkey Price-Fixing Lawsuit, Clears Perdue and Foster Farms
Jul 9, 2026 by
CPI
Italy Penalizes Character.AI Owner Over Child Safety and Privacy Controls
Jul 9, 2026 by
CPI
State AGs Prepare Antitrust Complaint Against Paramount-Warner Bros. Discovery
Jul 9, 2026 by
CPI
Latham & Watkins Expands Brussels Antitrust Practice
Jul 9, 2026 by
CPI
EU Makes SAP Antitrust Commitments Binding in ERP Support Case
Jul 9, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Due Process
Jul 7, 2026 by
CPI
The Hart‑Scott‑Rodino Act at Fifty: Procedure, Thresholds, Serial Acquisitions, and Industry Dynamics
Jul 7, 2026 by
Ginger Zhe Jin, Mario Leccese, Daniel Sokol, Liad Wagman & Mengyi Zhong
Due Process In Competition Cases: Reflections As Of 2026
Jul 7, 2026 by
Ian Forrester & Pablo Trevisan
When Referees Become Reformers: Due Process and Constitutional Considerations in Competition Market Investigations
Jul 7, 2026 by
John Taladay & Christine Ryu-Naya
Procedural Fairness in Antitrust Enforcement: A Comparative Analysis
Jul 7, 2026 by
J. Mark Gidley & Daniel Sokol