The US Federal Trade Commission released a statement offered by Commissioner Edith Ramirez regarding the US Supreme Court’s recent decision not to hear an appeal of the US Court of Appeal’s 2012 decision that ruled a previous battery component merger as anticompetitive. The appeals court found that Polypore’s buyout of Microporous, a competitor, could harm consumers and subsequently ruled that Microporous must be divested. Ramirez applauded the Supreme Court’s denial to consider that ruling’s appeal, saying that the divesture requirement “ensures that consumers will benefit from the competition between these rival firms.” The FTC issued a Decision and Order against Polypore over the acquisition in November 2010, a deal the regulator ruled anticompetitive as it restricted competition in three of its four markets in North America.
Full Content: Federal Trade Commission
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Redfin Settles $9.2M Commission Inflation Lawsuits
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
DOJ Supports Colorado’s Efforts to Block Kroger-Albertsons Merger
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
Japan Considers Regulation of AI Developers
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
European Commission Extends Decision Deadline for Ita-Lufthansa Merger
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
UK, US and Australia Sanction Senior Leader of LockBit Cybercrime Gang
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI