The US Federal Trade Commission released a statement offered by Commissioner Edith Ramirez regarding the US Supreme Court’s recent decision not to hear an appeal of the US Court of Appeal’s 2012 decision that ruled a previous battery component merger as anticompetitive. The appeals court found that Polypore’s buyout of Microporous, a competitor, could harm consumers and subsequently ruled that Microporous must be divested. Ramirez applauded the Supreme Court’s denial to consider that ruling’s appeal, saying that the divesture requirement “ensures that consumers will benefit from the competition between these rival firms.” The FTC issued a Decision and Order against Polypore over the acquisition in November 2010, a deal the regulator ruled anticompetitive as it restricted competition in three of its four markets in North America.
Featured News
Obama Calls on Democrats to Confront Risks From Rapid AI Growth
Sep 13, 2026 by
CPI
Cravath Lands Six Weil Partners in High-Profile M&A Team Hire
Sep 13, 2026 by
CPI
Paramount, State AGs Set October Settlement Talks in Antitrust Fight
Sep 13, 2026 by
CPI
Broadcom’s VMware Licensing Changes Draw Deeper EU Antitrust Scrutiny
Sep 13, 2026 by
CPI
South Korea’s Antitrust Fines Hit Record as Regulator Steps Up Chaebol Scrutiny
Sep 13, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – State Attorneys General
Aug 27, 2026 by
CPI
CPI Talks… with Jonathan Skrmetti, Attorney General of Tennessee
Aug 27, 2026 by
Jonathan Skrmetti
What the Live Nation Jury Instructions Tell Us About California’s Unfair Competition Law
Aug 27, 2026 by
Henry Hauser, Brent Nakamura, Ashley Kaplan, Brian Wang & Cari Jeffries
From Backroom Deals to Public Scrutiny: The Tunney Act’s Past, Present, and Future
Aug 27, 2026 by
Christina M. Black & Ashley A. Locke
Understanding the Fragility of Economic Concentration Through the Principles of Ecology
Aug 27, 2026 by
Alexandra Spring