A PYMNTS Company

US: Health company loses appeal to arbitrate antitrust claims

By  |  November 2, 2015

Sutter Health has lost a key court ruling, opening the door to a trial on claims that the Sacramento-based health system uses its dominance in Northern California to overcharge patients, employers and insurers.

    Get the Full Story

    Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

    yesSubscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

    By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

    A state appeals court in San Francisco ruled Oct. 27 that Sutter can’t require a union benefits trust to arbitrate its claim that the health system engaged in anti-competitive behavior that cranked up costs for thousands of workers.

    United Food and Commercial Workers & Employers Benefit Trust sued Sutter in April 2014, alleging the health system requires health plans, self-funded employers and others to include all Sutter hospitals in its networks, among other provisions. The lawsuit alleges Sutter enforces this policy through contracts that charge higher rates for out-of-network services.

    The ruling Tuesday does not address merits of the lawsuit claims — only efforts by Sutter to arbitrate the case.

    Full content: Sacramento Business Journal

    Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.