A PYMNTS Company

US: Hotel, travel site collusion case tossed

By  |  February 19, 2014

A law suit alleging various travel booking cites and hotels in the US of colluding to fix prices was tossed by a judge this week, finding that there was not sufficient evidence to support the plaintiffs’ claims.

    Get the Full Story

    Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

    yesSubscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

    By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

    Reports say the case claimed travel sites like Expedia and Priceline colluded with hotel chains including Hilton and Hyatt to allow the travel sites to list the same price for hotel rooms so they could all claim they had the cheapest offer. The plaintiffs argued that this practice lead to price-fixing.

    But a US District Judge tossed the case, ruling that the plaintiffs are looking to “have the Court infer an antitrust violation” and that they are asking the court “to repudiate antitrust law’s well-established focus on interbrand pricing and the rule that a business need not compete against itself in setting the price of its own product.”

    Rather, the judge said, the evidence suggested significant pricing competition between hotels.

    Full Content: Consumerist

    Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.