A law suit alleging various travel booking cites and hotels in the US of colluding to fix prices was tossed by a judge this week, finding that there was not sufficient evidence to support the plaintiffs’ claims.
Reports say the case claimed travel sites like Expedia and Priceline colluded with hotel chains including Hilton and Hyatt to allow the travel sites to list the same price for hotel rooms so they could all claim they had the cheapest offer. The plaintiffs argued that this practice lead to price-fixing.
But a US District Judge tossed the case, ruling that the plaintiffs are looking to “have the Court infer an antitrust violation” and that they are asking the court “to repudiate antitrust law’s well-established focus on interbrand pricing and the rule that a business need not compete against itself in setting the price of its own product.”
Rather, the judge said, the evidence suggested significant pricing competition between hotels.
Full Content: Consumerist
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Redfin Settles $9.2M Commission Inflation Lawsuits
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
DOJ Supports Colorado’s Efforts to Block Kroger-Albertsons Merger
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
Japan Considers Regulation of AI Developers
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
European Commission Extends Decision Deadline for Ita-Lufthansa Merger
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
UK, US and Australia Sanction Senior Leader of LockBit Cybercrime Gang
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI