The US Federal Energy Regulatory Commission declared Monday that JPMorgan Chase & Co reaped hundreds of millions of dollars through manipulating the electricity market in California and the Midwest. The accusations placed yet another bruise on the reputation of the US bank, which reportedly has agreed to pay $400 million to settle the case. Other sources told media that JPMorgan may also be required to forfeit profits, which were allegedly made from overpayments made by grid operators between September 2010 and June 2011. A spokesperson for the bank declined to comment on the matter. Earlier reports suggested the lending giant is looking to improve its image following a string of major scandals, including the infamous LIBOR scandal as well as its accomplishment of enduring the 2008 financial crisis without a single reported quarterly loss. Sources said JPMorgan is willing to pay the fine to the FERC as early as today.
Featured News
Jury in Boston Set to Decide Takeda’s Fate in Amitiza Antitrust Trial
May 14, 2026 by
CPI
OnlyFans Faces New Antitrust Lawsuit
May 14, 2026 by
CPI
Americans’ Opposition to Hosting AI Data Centers Hardens, Survey Finds
May 14, 2026 by
CPI
NextEra Energy Agrees to $9.5 Million Settlement in Nuclear Industry Wage-Fixing Case
May 14, 2026 by
CPI
South Korea’s Antitrust Agency Raids Petrochemical Firms in Price-Fixing Probe
May 14, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Unilateral Effects
Apr 28, 2026 by
CPI
A Net Present Value Approach to Merger Analysis
Apr 28, 2026 by
Joseph J Simons & Malcolm Coate
Generative AI and Competitive Disruption: Increasingly Relevant for Merger Analysis?
Apr 28, 2026 by
Andrea Coscelli, Emily Chissell, Nitika Bagaria & Tega Akati-Udi
Non-Price Unilateral Effects In Media Mergers
Apr 28, 2026 by
Lapo Filistrucchi & Teresa Oriani
Ecosystem Mergers and Unilateral Effects? A Framework for Assessing the Ecosystem Theory of Harm
Apr 28, 2026 by
Ethel Fonseca, George Tucker & Helder Vasconcelos