In the latest development of the case, a US District Judge has approved of the plaintiffs’ request to withdraw their acceptance of a settlement offered by hospital system UPMC and insurer Highmark Inc., accused of conspiring to bar competing insurers out of the region. According to reports, the defendants had originally offered a settlement of up to $4.5 million for the attorneys. While the plaintiffs, which include a hotel company and a property management conglomerate of Western Pennsylvania, first accepted the offer, they moved to withdrawal the acceptance, arguing the settlement was not sufficient to premium payers. The plaintiffs argued that the alleged collusion between the defendants allowed Highmark to charge excessive premium rates.
Full Content: Trib Live
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Redfin Settles $9.2M Commission Inflation Lawsuits
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
DOJ Supports Colorado’s Efforts to Block Kroger-Albertsons Merger
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
Japan Considers Regulation of AI Developers
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
European Commission Extends Decision Deadline for Ita-Lufthansa Merger
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
UK, US and Australia Sanction Senior Leader of LockBit Cybercrime Gang
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI