A Justice Department case against two energy companies under fire for their alleged non-compete agreements is in jeopardy after a federal judge has threatened to dismiss the case altogether, citing an inadequate settlement proposal. US District Judge Richard Matsch in Colorado has given the DOJ a deadline of March 7 to revise the settlement with Gunnison Energy Corporation and SG Interests. A settlement was reached about a year ago in which the companies would be ordered to pay $275,000 – a sum Judge Matsch finds too small, arguing that Gunnison demonstrated “unrepentant arrogance” at the company’s insistence of settling the antitrust claims. The energy companies were accused of colluding to rig bids for natural gas leases.
Featured News
Digital-Asset Treasury Companies Push Boundaries of Corporate Finance
Nov 7, 2025 by
CPI
European Commission Considering Delaying Full Implementation of AI Act by a Year
Nov 7, 2025 by
CPI
Judge Withholds Approval of Google–Epic Games Antitrust Settlement Pending Review
Nov 6, 2025 by
CPI
Bank of England Vows to Issue Stablecoin Regs ‘Just as Quickly as the U.S.’
Nov 6, 2025 by
CPI
No Federal Bailout for AI, Says White House Tech Chief
Nov 6, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Costs of Consolidation
Oct 26, 2025 by
CPI
Does Merger Enforcement Protect Consumers from the Long-Term Costs of Consolidation?
Oct 26, 2025 by
Diana L. Moss
“Praying for Inflation”: How Market Concentration Facilitates Inflationary Pressures
Oct 26, 2025 by
John Kwoka & Muhammad Shabanpour
Unpacking the Remedy: The Hidden Costs of Merger Remedies and the Economist’s Role in Getting Them Right
Oct 26, 2025 by
Sam R. Carless, Mary Coleman & David Weiskopf
Why Industry Consolidation Causes More Concern Than It Should
Oct 26, 2025 by
Michael Noel