A Justice Department case against two energy companies under fire for their alleged non-compete agreements is in jeopardy after a federal judge has threatened to dismiss the case altogether, citing an inadequate settlement proposal. US District Judge Richard Matsch in Colorado has given the DOJ a deadline of March 7 to revise the settlement with Gunnison Energy Corporation and SG Interests. A settlement was reached about a year ago in which the companies would be ordered to pay $275,000 – a sum Judge Matsch finds too small, arguing that Gunnison demonstrated “unrepentant arrogance” at the company’s insistence of settling the antitrust claims. The energy companies were accused of colluding to rig bids for natural gas leases.
Featured News
Meta Halts Commercial Terms Rollout After Publishers Raise Concerns in EU, UK
Oct 28, 2026 by
CPI
Nvidia’s $12.9 Billion Hugging Face Deal Draws Justice Department Questions
Oct 28, 2026 by
CPI
Rolls-Royce’s UltraFan Wins £2.5 Billion UK Framework Deal
Oct 28, 2026 by
CPI
Taiwan Blocks Grab’s $600 Million Foodpanda Deal, Citing Uber Ties
Oct 28, 2026 by
CPI
South Korea Expands Food Price-Fixing Probe to Four Major Instant Noodle Makers
Oct 28, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Exclusive Dealing
Oct 25, 2026 by
CPI
Exclusive Dealing Without Exclusivity: Screening Contracts, Loyalty Rebates, and the Limits of Antitrust Tests
Oct 25, 2026 by
David Martimort & Jérôme Pouyet
When Competition for Exclusivity Raises Prices: Rebates, Pricing Rules, and the Insulin Puzzle
Oct 25, 2026 by
Daniel P. O’Brien & Greg Shaffer
Why Leaving the Door Open Can Be (Much) Worse Than Closing It: Share-Based Requirements, Buyer-Specific Costs, and Foreclosure
Oct 25, 2026 by
Zhijun Chen & Greg Shaffer
Antitrust Chronicle® – EU Merger Guidelines
Oct 19, 2026 by
CPI