Three years after Steve Jobs’s death, the Apple founder continues to play a vital role in Apple lawsuits.
This time, Apple is set to begin trial today in a lawsuit accusing the technology company of violating antitrust law by forcing iPod customers to play songs downloaded only from the iTunes store or uploaded from CDs.
Plaintiffs argue Apple harmed competition and forced consumers to pay higher prices for iTunes music as opposed to music downloaded from iTunes competitors.
It’s the third major antitrust lawsuit filed against Apple in which Jobs will play a crucial, postmortem role, reports say.
Litigators will use Jobs’s past emails as evidence, as well as a videotaped deposition recorded before his death.
Similar evidence was used in two previously lawsuits. One involved a group of Silicon Valley technology employees, who accused Apple and other companies of colluding to not hire each other’s workers in an effort to suppress wages. The other involved the US Department of Justice’s investigation and subsequent lawsuit against Apple on allegations of eBook price-fixing.
Experts say that Apple has its work cut out for it when it comes to giving Jobs’s emails a positive spin. Rutgers School of Law professor Michael A. Carrier told reporters that while Jobs was an innovative “genius,” “it went along with a really healthy ego and perhaps the lack of an antitrust filter – thinking about how these words would appear years later tossed up on the screen in front of a jury.”
Other experts say Jobs will likely present an impression of an eager businessman fighting to conserve the success of the iPod.
In the previous two antitrust cases, Jobs’s words served in favor of plaintiffs. Reports say Apple will likely argue that software updates, which plaintiffs say perpetuated the iPod’s ability to only play music from iTunes of CDs, was merely to improve performance of the device.
Plaintiffs are seeking about $350 million in damages, according to reports.
Full content: NYTimes
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Breaking Up Google? DOJ Floats Major Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
Oct 9, 2024 by
CPI
Walmex Awaits Antitrust Ruling as Mexican Regulator Probes Alleged Practices
Oct 8, 2024 by
CPI
Crypto.com Sues SEC, Alleging Regulatory Overreach in Crypto Industry
Oct 8, 2024 by
CPI
Elite US Universities Face New Antitrust Suit Over Financial Aid Practices
Oct 8, 2024 by
CPI
Kirkland & Ellis Strengthens Antitrust Practice with New Partner from FTC
Oct 8, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh