Lawyers heading a lawsuit against major banks and other major institutions accused of manipulating aluminum prices will not give up on the case despite its dismissal last week, say reports.
US District Judge Katherine Forrest dismissed the case earlier this month, ruling that the plaintiffs failed to show sufficient evidence that the banks intended to manipulate aluminum prices.
But the lawyers said they plan to appeal by the September 19 deadline, according to reports.
Three lawyers are representing eight small US aluminum consumers that accuse Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase and Glencore of conspiring to drive up aluminum prices by hoarding supplies in warehouses.
According to reports, Judge Forrest has set a high standard for allowing the case to proceed. Experts consider the lawsuit an especially complex case.
Full content: Reuters
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Redfin Settles $9.2M Commission Inflation Lawsuits
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
DOJ Supports Colorado’s Efforts to Block Kroger-Albertsons Merger
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
Japan Considers Regulation of AI Developers
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
European Commission Extends Decision Deadline for Ita-Lufthansa Merger
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
UK, US and Australia Sanction Senior Leader of LockBit Cybercrime Gang
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI