A federal appeals court on Wednesday ruled in favor of Pandora Media Inc in a dispute over the payment of royalties for online music.
The 2nd US Circuit Court of Appeals in New York rejected the American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers’ effort to increase the rate that Pandora must pay to license its music from 2013 to 2015.
The appeals court also said a consent decree governing ASCAP’s licensing activities “unambiguously” precludes that entity from letting music publishers stop it from licensing their works to “new media” music users such as Pandora, while continuing to license those works to others.
Wednesday’s decision upheld lower court rulings.
Full content: The New York Times
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Redfin Settles $9.2M Commission Inflation Lawsuits
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
DOJ Supports Colorado’s Efforts to Block Kroger-Albertsons Merger
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
Japan Considers Regulation of AI Developers
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
European Commission Extends Decision Deadline for Ita-Lufthansa Merger
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
UK, US and Australia Sanction Senior Leader of LockBit Cybercrime Gang
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI