While the US Department of Justice agreed to reduce Apple Inc.’s penalties following a court’s decision the tech giant conspired to fix eBooks prices, Apple reportedly continued to seek lighter penalties and denied any wrongdoing in the case.
Reports say a filing, made last Friday, showed the DOJ has agreed to reducing proposed sanctions against Apple – which include establishing a watchdog for the company, restrictions on its relationship with publishers, and allowing competitors to link to their eBook stores from their phone apps – from 10 years to just five. Apple and the DOJ were required by a judge to meet and discuss a possible compromise, where the reduced penalties apparently were formed.
Despite the meeting and the reduced punishment, the DOJ claims Apple continued to deny any wrongdoing in the case. In the filing, the DOJ claims Apple “wants to do business as usual, regardless of the antitrust laws.” Further, the watchdog described Apple as untrustworthy in preventing such business practices in the future. Apple has not responded to the filing. Apple continues to disapprove of the idea that the tech giant needs its own watchdog.
The DOJ initiated the price-fixing case against Apple and several eBooks publishers last year; all publishers settled.
Full Content: Los Angeles Times and Bloomberg
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Trump Nominates Olivia Trusty for FCC Commissioner Role Ahead of Inauguration
Jan 16, 2025 by
CPI
Lawyers Claim eXp’s Settlement Tactics Hurt Antitrust Case Potential
Jan 16, 2025 by
CPI
Amex GBT Pushes Back Against DOJ Lawsuit Over CWT Acquisition
Jan 16, 2025 by
CPI
Belgium Opens Antitrust Probe into AB InBev’s Market Practices
Jan 16, 2025 by
CPI
Tech Groups Sue CFPB Over New Rule on Digital Wallet Oversight
Jan 16, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand