Bayer Corporation, sued along with other pharmaceutical companies in a class action for allegations of pay-for-delay contracts and non-compete agreements, has partially settled with plaintiffs for $74 million, though the additional defendants have yet to reach a similar agreement.
Bayer, along with Barr, Hoechst Marion Roussel, Watson Pharmaceuticals and The Rugby Group, were brought to court for so-called pay-for-delay agreements, alleged to have paid the generic makers of an antibiotic called Cipro to delay sales; the drug companies are refuting the claims.
Members of the class involve buyers of Cipro within California between January 8, 1977 and October 31, 2004.
Full Content: PR Newswire
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
FTC Withdraws Case Against Microsoft-Activision Merger, Citing Public Interest
May 23, 2025 by
CPI
Charter to Acquire Cox Communications in $35 Billion Deal
May 22, 2025 by
CPI
FTC Targets Media Watchdog Over Alleged Collusion Against Musk’s X
May 22, 2025 by
CPI
FTC Drops Antitrust Case Accusing Pepsi of Squeezing Small Retailers
May 22, 2025 by
CPI
Shein Warns of Higher Costs for French Shoppers Amid EU Fee Proposal
May 22, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Industrial Policy
May 21, 2025 by
CPI
Industrial Strategy and the Role of Competition – Taking a Business Lens
May 21, 2025 by
Marcus Bokkerink
Industrial Policy, Antitrust, and Economic Growth: Some Observations
May 21, 2025 by
David S. Evans
Bolder by Design: Crafting Pro-Competitive Industrial Policies For Complex Challenges
May 21, 2025 by
Antonio Capobianco & Beatriz Marques
Competition-Friendly Industrial Policy
May 21, 2025 by
Philippe Aghion, Mathias Dewatripont & Patrick Legros