The Senate Judiciary Committee’s subcommittee on antitrust, competition policy and consumer rights heard from six witnesses, each representing a different part of the country’s current music licensing landscape. The hearing was titled “How Much For a Song?: The Antitrust Decrees that Govern the Market for Music.”
To answer that question, parties big and small clashed over the relevance in the digital age of a couple of consent decrees issued by the U.S. Department of Justice in 1941 that regulate how songwriters get paid when their work gets played.
At Tuesday’s hearing, ASCAP, BMI, songwriters and senators all suggested that the system is breaking down as streaming services like Pandora, Spotify and iTunes replace traditional music venues as the biggest source for hearing music.
“The use of music has increased exponentially, but the payments have not followed,” said ASCAP CEO Elizabeth Matthews.
Full Content: Billboard
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Redfin Settles $9.2M Commission Inflation Lawsuits
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
DOJ Supports Colorado’s Efforts to Block Kroger-Albertsons Merger
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
Japan Considers Regulation of AI Developers
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
European Commission Extends Decision Deadline for Ita-Lufthansa Merger
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
UK, US and Australia Sanction Senior Leader of LockBit Cybercrime Gang
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI