The Department of Justice (DOJ) announced this week that ValueAct, activist investment manager, has agreed to pay a record $11 million to settle allegations that it violated the requirements of the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act by improperly relying on the “investment-only” exemption to avoid reporting the transaction and observing the appropriate waiting period.
The settlement stems from ValueAct’s purchases in 2014 and 2015 of stock in two direct competitors, with the intent to participate in those companies’ business decisions, without first complying with the HSR Act’s requirements. As part of the settlement, ValueAct also agreed to injunctive relief designed to prevent future violations.
The complaint details how ValueAct used its access to senior executives of both Halliburton and Baker Hughes to attempt to influence the companies’ proposed merger and other aspects of their businesses. For example, ValueAct executives met frequently with the top executives of the companies and sent numerous e-mails to the executives on a variety of business issues. During these meetings, ValueAct identified specific business areas for improvement and made presentations on post-merger integration.
Full Content: Mondaq
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Supreme Court Declines to Hear Realtors’ Appeal, DOJ Antitrust Probe Moves Forward
Jan 13, 2025 by
CPI
Commerzbank Chairman Doubts Amicable Merger with UniCredit After Stake Acquisition
Jan 13, 2025 by
CPI
Senator Warren Presses HUD Nominee on Rent Price-Fixing
Jan 13, 2025 by
CPI
Epic Games CEO Accuses Tech Giants of Shifting Loyalties to Court Trump Administration
Jan 13, 2025 by
CPI
Apple’s New Developer Fees Face Renewed Scrutiny from EU Antitrust Regulators
Jan 13, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand