The US Supreme Court is set to meet next week to decide whether to hear a case that challenges a merger and, in doing so, looks to clarify the legal definition of a competitor specific to a “current” versus a “potential” competitor. The case stems from the Federal Trade Commission’s move to block a merger between two battery separator manufacturers after finding the two parties to be competitors, despite the fact one had not yet recorded sales in the market. The 11th US Circuit Court of Appeals sided with the FTC’s challenge the to deal, which saw Polypore International Inc acquiring Microporous Products LP; Microporous had not yet recorded any sales of automotive battery operators. Now Polypore is challenging that decision on the grounds that there needs to be clarification “on how to distinguish between mergers of current competitors and mergers of potential competitors. According to reports, the White House is looking to have Polypore’s petition to the Supreme Court denied. The Court will meet June 20.
Featured News
Meta Ordered to Grant Rival AI Chatbots Free WhatsApp Access During EU Antitrust Probe
Jun 9, 2026 by
CPI
Former DOJ Antitrust Leaders Criticize Live Nation Settlement After Trial’s Abrupt End
Jun 9, 2026 by
CPI
Musicians Union Takes Warner and Universal to Court Over AI Training Rights
Jun 9, 2026 by
CPI
Massachusetts Lawmakers Unanimously Pass Comprehensive Privacy Protections
Jun 9, 2026 by
CPI
Nuvei Nears $2.7 Billion Deal to Acquire Payoneer, Sources Say
Jun 9, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – (Geo)Political Antitrust
May 28, 2026 by
CPI
Competition Policy in Turbulent Geopolitical Times
May 28, 2026 by
Christophe Carugati & Annabelle Gawer
The New Political Determinants of U.S. Antitrust Policy
May 28, 2026 by
Aziz Z. Huq
The Geopolitical Rewiring of Antitrust
May 28, 2026 by
Hayane C. Dahmen
Three Strikes Against Political Antitrust
May 28, 2026 by
Nolan McCarty & Sepehr Shahshahani