A lawsuit initiated by Sprint shareholders concerning SoftBank’s $20.1 billion offer to buy out the US mobile telecommunications company got underway Friday morning as plaintiffs’ lawyers argued that the deal favors SoftBank over existing Sprint shareholders. District Judge Thomas M. Sutherland in Kansas heard the first arguments Friday as plaintiffs made their case to delay Sprint’s shareholder vote, currently scheduled for June 12. According to reports, if the deal were to go through SoftBank would control 70 percent of Sprint. Despite the plans to vote on the deal, Sprint is reportedly still in talks with Dish, which has offered to buy Sprint for $25.5 billion.
Featured News
Biden’s Former Antitrust Chiefs Launch AI Legal Startup FluxCap
Oct 28, 2026 by
CPI
NBA Teams Up With US Regulator on Prediction Markets
Oct 27, 2026 by
CPI
Intesa Wins ECB Approval for $36 Billion Monte dei Paschi Takeover
Oct 27, 2026 by
CPI
PayPal, Revolut Weigh In as UK Targets Apple’s Tap-to-Pay Rules
Oct 27, 2026 by
CPI
Heineken Ordered to Pay $124 Million in Greek Antitrust Case
Oct 27, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Exclusive Dealing
Oct 25, 2026 by
CPI
Exclusive Dealing Without Exclusivity: Screening Contracts, Loyalty Rebates, and the Limits of Antitrust Tests
Oct 25, 2026 by
David Martimort & Jérôme Pouyet
When Competition for Exclusivity Raises Prices: Rebates, Pricing Rules, and the Insulin Puzzle
Oct 25, 2026 by
Daniel P. O’Brien & Greg Shaffer
Why Leaving the Door Open Can Be (Much) Worse Than Closing It: Share-Based Requirements, Buyer-Specific Costs, and Foreclosure
Oct 25, 2026 by
Zhijun Chen & Greg Shaffer
Antitrust Chronicle® – EU Merger Guidelines
Oct 19, 2026 by
CPI