A lawsuit initiated by Sprint shareholders concerning SoftBank’s $20.1 billion offer to buy out the US mobile telecommunications company got underway Friday morning as plaintiffs’ lawyers argued that the deal favors SoftBank over existing Sprint shareholders. District Judge Thomas M. Sutherland in Kansas heard the first arguments Friday as plaintiffs made their case to delay Sprint’s shareholder vote, currently scheduled for June 12. According to reports, if the deal were to go through SoftBank would control 70 percent of Sprint. Despite the plans to vote on the deal, Sprint is reportedly still in talks with Dish, which has offered to buy Sprint for $25.5 billion.
Featured News
France Nears Decision on Potential Antitrust Charges Against Nvidia
Jul 12, 2026 by
CPI
DOJ, FTC Encourage States to Probe High Gasoline Prices
Jul 12, 2026 by
CPI
EU Poised to Launch In-Depth Antitrust Probe Into Saipem-Subsea7 Merger
Jul 12, 2026 by
CPI
China Targets Food Delivery Subsidy Battles With New Rules on Platform Competition
Jul 12, 2026 by
CPI
State Challenge to Media Deal Draws Allegations of Election-Year Motivations
Jul 12, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Due Process
Jul 7, 2026 by
CPI
The Hart‑Scott‑Rodino Act at Fifty: Procedure, Thresholds, Serial Acquisitions, and Industry Dynamics
Jul 7, 2026 by
Ginger Zhe Jin, Mario Leccese, Daniel Sokol, Liad Wagman & Mengyi Zhong
Due Process In Competition Cases: Reflections As Of 2026
Jul 7, 2026 by
Ian Forrester & Pablo Trevisan
When Referees Become Reformers: Due Process and Constitutional Considerations in Competition Market Investigations
Jul 7, 2026 by
John Taladay & Christine Ryu-Naya
Procedural Fairness in Antitrust Enforcement: A Comparative Analysis
Jul 7, 2026 by
J. Mark Gidley & Daniel Sokol