Posted by Reason
Why the Government Shouldn’t Break Up Google
By Andrea O’Sullivan
Has Google’s market dominance been a net negative for consumers and innovation—and should government antitrust regulators intervene?
Historically, Google’s algorithymic innovation fueled the profitable development of ad-based internet monetization and enabled Google to invest in breakthroughs in mapping, messaging, email, smartphone, and artificial intelligence technology. If something was hot in Silicon Valley, Google probably had something to do with it, or they soon acquired the firm that did.
What was once revolutionary eventually became common technology. Now, every day, hundreds of millions of satisfied internet users enjoy a handful of free Google services that improve their lives without even really thinking about them.
Featured News
NCAA and SEC Approve Historic $2.8 Billion Settlement in Antitrust Cases
May 23, 2024 by
CPI
Apple Defends 27% Fee in Compliance with Court Order, Phil Schiller Testifies
May 23, 2024 by
CPI
French Billionaire Xavier Niel Eyes $4 Billion Millicom Buyout
May 23, 2024 by
CPI
ITA-Lufthansa Merger Faces Scrutiny from European Commission
May 23, 2024 by
CPI
Google Explores Major Acquisition of HubSpot to Bolster Cloud
May 23, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Merger Guidelines Retrospective
May 21, 2024 by
CPI
Mergers of Complements
May 21, 2024 by
CPI
Personality Traits, Private Equity, and Merger Analysis
May 21, 2024 by
CPI
The 2023 Merger Guidelines: Lessons in the Importance of Incipiency, Modern Economics, and Monopsony
May 21, 2024 by
CPI
The 2023 Merger Guidelines: Sharpening Merger Analysis
May 21, 2024 by
CPI