Gig workers in California who drive for Uber, Lyft, and other rideshare and delivery platforms have filed a lawsuit in the state’s Supreme Court seeking to overturn Proposition 22, the Associated Press reported on Wednesday, January 13.
The California ballot initiative Prop 22 was upheld on Election Day in November, with 58% of voters supporting the measure that defines gig workers as independent contractors. The lawsuit claims that the new mandate is unconstitutional because it limits the government’s ability to empower workers to form unions. It also prevents drivers from getting workers’ compensation.
The ballot measure was promoted and supported by a US$200 million campaign funded by Uber, Lyft, and similar platforms. Labor unions burned through some US$20 million to fight the measure, and have now joined the new lawsuit filed by drivers.
Before Prop 22, California lawmakers were pushing for gig workers to be classified as company employees, which would make them eligible for health insurance and other benefits and provide protection against job loss.
“Prop. 22 doesn’t just fail our state rideshare drivers; it fails the basic test of following our state constitution,” Bob Schoonover of the Service Employees International Union told the AP. “The law as written by Uber and Lyft denies drivers rights under the law in California and makes it nearly impossible for lawmakers to fix these problems.”
Featured News
Judge Mehta Questions Both Sides in Landmark Google Antitrust Case
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
FCC Urges Urgent Funding for Removal of Chinese Telecom Equipment from U.S. Networks
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
Former Pioneer CEO Facing Potential Criminal Charges For Colluding With OPEC
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
South Korea’s Antitrust Regulator Greenlights K-Pop Powerhouse Deal
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
Exxon’s Pioneer Purchase Approved, Former CEO Barred from Board
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI