Twenty years after the emergence of platform literature antitrust courts and authorities still face formidable challenges in deciphering platform business models. The latest two Google cases (Google Search, Google Android) highlight the schism between what firms consider an innovative business plan and what the law is ready to accept. Noting the schism, this article focuses on a number of points that European competition law needs to address to better reconcile business practice with antitrust legal analysis with the view to enable successful firms to operate without fear of punitive enforcement.
Featured News
Former Perrigo Executive Wins Partial Dismissal of Generic-Drug Price-Fixing Claims
Sep 14, 2026 by
CPI
Sony Reaches $7.85 Million Settlement in PlayStation Antitrust Case
Sep 14, 2026 by
CPI
US Senators Weigh New Safety Obligations for Powerful AI Developers
Sep 14, 2026 by
CPI
DOJ Antitrust Litigator Dahlquist Returns to Winston Taylor
Sep 14, 2026 by
CPI
South Korea Prosecutors Seek Arrests of Petrochemical Executives in Price-Fixing Probe
Sep 14, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – State Attorneys General
Aug 27, 2026 by
CPI
CPI Talks… with Jonathan Skrmetti, Attorney General of Tennessee
Aug 27, 2026 by
Jonathan Skrmetti
What the Live Nation Jury Instructions Tell Us About California’s Unfair Competition Law
Aug 27, 2026 by
Henry Hauser, Brent Nakamura, Ashley Kaplan, Brian Wang & Cari Jeffries
From Backroom Deals to Public Scrutiny: The Tunney Act’s Past, Present, and Future
Aug 27, 2026 by
Christina M. Black & Ashley A. Locke
Understanding the Fragility of Economic Concentration Through the Principles of Ecology
Aug 27, 2026 by
Alexandra Spring