By Caron Beaton-Wells (Melbourne Law School)
Deterring, detecting and prosecuting cartel conduct is a high priority for competition authorities worldwide. This conduct involves various forms of agreement, arrangement or practice between competitors that eliminate or subvert processes of competition and thereby have the potential to increase prices, reduce consumer choice and stifle innovation. Cartel conduct is widely seen as in the category of anti-competitive conduct most harmful to consumer and economic welfare. Serious or so-called ‘hard-core’ cartels usually involve secrecy and deception by participants, with the deliberate aim of avoiding discovery. They are therefore difficult to detect and, as documentary evidence is rarely available, difficult to prosecute even when detected. Such activity is also often highly lucrative. It is therefore problematic to deter, even in the face of the toughest sanctions.
Featured News
UK Probes Lindab’s Acquisition of HAS-Vent Amid Fears of Market Monopoly
Apr 28, 2024 by
CPI
Shein Faces EU Regulations Over User Data
Apr 28, 2024 by
CPI
Google Fights Back Against US Antitrust Lawsuit
Apr 28, 2024 by
CPI
US Homeland Security Establishes Blue-Ribbon Board with Tech CEOs to Advise on AI
Apr 28, 2024 by
CPI
FTC Accuses Amazon Executives of Using Disappearing Messaging Apps to Conceal Evidence
Apr 28, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI