A PYMNTS Company

US: Judge rules Uber can be added as defendant to surge pricing lawsuit

By  |  June 21, 2016

A federal judge says ride-hailing service Uber can be added as a defendant to an antitrust lawsuit against the company’s co-founder and CEO, Travis Kalanick.

    Get the Full Story

    Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

    yesSubscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

    By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

    Uber is a “necessary party” in the lawsuit, US District Judge Jed Rakoff said in a decision made public Monday.

    We’d love to be your preferred source for news.

    Please add us to your preferred sources list so our news, data and interviews show up in your feed. Thanks!

    Add as Preferred Source

    The decision, however, is good news for Uber because it could push the suit toward arbitration, something that Kalanick and the company prefers. Uber’s user agreement calls for disputes to be settled through arbitration and Rakoff said the lawsuit was directed specifically at Kalanick to get around that policy.

    “While plaintiff now pretends that he ‘seeks no relief whatsoever against Uber,’ such an assertion is at odds with any fair reading of plaintiff’s claim,” Rakoff said.

    At issue is surge pricing, which happens when demand for drivers spikes, and prices for rides, which are set via algorithm, do too. It’s a controversial practice and one that’s upset consumers.

    The antitrust class action suit was filed in December, saying that Kalanick “had orchestrated and facilitated an illegal price-fixing conspiracy.”

    Full Content: CNET

    Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.