Financial Exchange Consolidation and Antitrust: Is There a Need for More Intervention?
Posted by Social Science Research Network
Financial Exchange Consolidation and Antitrust: Is There a Need for More Intervention? – Alexander Okuliar (Government of the United States of America – Federal Trade Commission)
ABSTRACT: Financial exchanges are the heart of the modern economy. As they have evolved from small nonprofit venues to large multinational corporations, their profit incentives have encouraged a vibrant mergers and acquisitions environment, allowing exchanges to pursue greater network effects and economies of scale. The national stock exchanges have absorbed the regional exchanges, and the three primary futures exchanges have combined into one of the world’s largest exchange groups.
The Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice has remained largely silent during this wave of consolidation, publicly analyzing only a handful of more than a dozen deals and moving to block only one exchange merger in the last decade. Some have questioned whether the agency is doing enough; others argue it is doing too much. On most levels, a light touch arguably has been appropriate for this sector because exchanges exhibit a unique blend of network effects, scale and scope economies, disruptive technologies, and complex regulatory environments. In addition, financial exchanges have a long history of self-regulation.
This self-regulatory philosophy, as well as the broad, non-competition investor protection mandates of the Securities and Exchange Commission and Commodity Futures Trading Commission, the platform economics of exchanges, and the increasing reliance on technology, together have yielded a unique competitive terrain in the exchange industry. As a consequence, the DOJ has had less latitude to act here because competition concerns often are subordinated to non-competition goals and market concentration and self-regulation pose certain specific benefits sought by regulators. But recent incidents like the May 2010 flash crash, the problematic Facebook initial public offering, and other technical issues have raised questions about possible structural flaws in the existing competitive and regulatory landscape. These incidents also implicate the proper role for the DOJ in enforcing and advocating for vigorous competition in these markets.
Featured News
Judge Mehta Questions Both Sides in Landmark Google Antitrust Case
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
FCC Urges Urgent Funding for Removal of Chinese Telecom Equipment from U.S. Networks
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
Former Pioneer CEO Facing Potential Criminal Charges For Colluding With OPEC
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
South Korea’s Antitrust Regulator Greenlights K-Pop Powerhouse Deal
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
Exxon’s Pioneer Purchase Approved, Former CEO Barred from Board
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI