A PYMNTS Company

Does European Union Policy Making Explain Accounting Choices? An Empirical Analysis of the Effects of Investigations by the Directorate General for Competition on Accounting Choices

By  |  January 24, 2014

Posted by Social Science Research Network

    Get the Full Story

    Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

    yesSubscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

    By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

    Does European Union Policy Making Explain Accounting Choices? An Empirical Analysis of the Effects of Investigations by the Directorate General for Competition on Accounting Choices – Roland Koenigsgruber (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) and David Windisch (University of Graz)

    ABSTRACT: The hypothesis that political costs caused by the regulatory process impact upon accounting has been tested extensively and has found considerable empirical support. However, most studies use data from the United States. Whether the conclusions carry over to different institutional settings is an open question. This study exploits the fact that, in the European Union, there exists a policy area – competition policy – in which the European Commission can act in a manner significantly less constrained than in most other policy areas, imposing substantial fines on companies found to be in infringement of European competition regulations. Companies investigated by the Commission’s Directorate General for Competition have strong incentives to deflect attention and keep a low profile. It is conjectured that such companies will use income-decreasing accruals in order not to appear to be making unjustified profits. The results confirm this conjecture.