A PYMNTS Company

Competition and the Most Favored Nation Clause

By  |  September 11, 2013

Posted by D. Daniel Sokol

    Get the Full Story

    Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

    yesSubscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

    By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

    Jason J. Wu & John P. Bigelow (Compass Lexecon) discuss Competition and the Most Favored Nation Clause

    ABSTRACT: In her recent decision in the eBook price-fixing case U.S. District Court Judge Denise Cote identified the Most Favored Nation (“MFN”) clause in Apple’s contracts with book publishers as a component of the price-fixing conspiracy in which she found Apple and the publishers had engaged. This was a significant moment in the history of the controversial agreements because, up until then, defenders of MFN agreements had been fond of observing that no court had ever found an MFN to be anticompetitive. Now that the MFN has been implicated, we can expect that disputes over the competitive effects of MFN clauses will come up in more cases, and that the debate about them will continue among economists, attorneys, and antitrust practitioners.