A class action antitrust lawsuit filed against health servicer Sutter Health was thrown out by a San Francisco judge, but plaintiffs were given time to amend their complaint and file again. The case, filed last September by residents of Northern California, claimed that individuals receiving health services from Sutter paid thousands more every year due to the servicer’s anticompetitive conduct. Specifically, Sutter is accused of requiring health plans to use Sutter healthcare providers even if competitors were priced lower. The exclusions lead to much higher prices for those receiving healthcare, claim the plaintiffs. The class action vowed to amend its complaint and approach the Ninth Circuit if their case is again dismissed.
Featured News
EU’s Largest Economies Push to Reduce Reliance on Foreign Payment Systems
Mar 12, 2026 by
CPI
Warren Presses Amazon for Answers on Pricing Practices for Government Buyers
Mar 12, 2026 by
CPI
EU Antitrust Chief Raises Concerns Over Big Tech Control of AI
Mar 12, 2026 by
CPI
Burson Adds Senior Advisor to Strengthen Competition Team
Mar 12, 2026 by
CPI
South Korea Fines Pork Processors for Price-Fixing in Retail Supply Deals
Mar 12, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Behavioral Economics
Feb 22, 2026 by
CPI
Behavioral Antitrust in 2026
Feb 22, 2026 by
Maurice Stucke
Behavioral Economics in Competition Policy: Going Beyond Inertia and Framing Effects
Feb 22, 2026 by
Annemieke Tuinstra & Richard May
Agreeing to Disagree in Antitrust
Feb 22, 2026 by
Jorge Padilla
Recognizing What’s Around the Corner: Merger Control, Capabilities, and the New Nature of Potential Competition
Feb 22, 2026 by
Magdalena Kuyterink & David J. Teece