A case filed with the Federal Antimonopoly Service between two cement companies has been rejected by the regulator, stating that no antitrust violations have been made. BaselCement-Pikalyovo filed a claim against Pikalyvsky Cement accusing the competitor of breaking law after Pikalyvsky revoked its order for raw materials despite the fact that it is the sole customer for BaselCement. According to BaselCement, the retraction of the order threatened to cease cement production; the company halted operations in 2009 due to a raw material shortage in a situation resolved by a supplies treaty. The FAS declined to hear the case, however.
Featured News
FTC Reaches $17M Settlement With Xponential Fitness Over Franchise Violations
Mar 19, 2026 by
CPI
Trump Administration Defends Pentagon Blacklisting of AI Firm Anthropic in Court Filing
Mar 18, 2026 by
CPI
BMG Sues Anthropic Over Alleged Use of Song Lyrics in AI Training
Mar 18, 2026 by
CPI
Google Proposes New Search Controls Amid UK Competition Scrutiny
Mar 18, 2026 by
CPI
US Appeals Court Revives Whistleblower Case Against Major Drugmakers Over Pricing Program
Mar 18, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Data-Driven Competition
Mar 19, 2026 by
CPI
Data-Driven Competition: Implications For Enforcement and Merger Control
Mar 19, 2026 by
Alexandre de Corniere & Greg Taylor
From Tipping to Trustees: Why Data-Driven Markets Require Institutional Design, Not Optimization
Mar 19, 2026 by
Jens Prüfer & Paul de Bijl
Data Barriers to Entry: What We’ve Learned About Spotting Them and What We Still Don’t Know About Solutions
Mar 19, 2026 by
Bruno Carballa-Smichowski
When the Perfect Is the Enemy of the Good: Price Discrimination, Affordability, Precarity and Market Dynamism
Mar 19, 2026 by
Dan Ciuriak