In the latest development of the case, a US District Judge has approved of the plaintiffs’ request to withdraw their acceptance of a settlement offered by hospital system UPMC and insurer Highmark Inc., accused of conspiring to bar competing insurers out of the region. According to reports, the defendants had originally offered a settlement of up to $4.5 million for the attorneys. While the plaintiffs, which include a hotel company and a property management conglomerate of Western Pennsylvania, first accepted the offer, they moved to withdrawal the acceptance, arguing the settlement was not sufficient to premium payers. The plaintiffs argued that the alleged collusion between the defendants allowed Highmark to charge excessive premium rates.
Featured News
Croatia Competition Authority Approves HPB Acquisition of Croatia Banka
Jul 19, 2026 by
CPI
Democratic Lawmakers Urge DOJ to Closely Examine Fox-Roku Merger
Jul 19, 2026 by
CPI
US Judge Clears Path for Broad Beef Antitrust Class Actions Against Major Meatpackers
Jul 19, 2026 by
CPI
India’s Competition Regulator Dismisses Antitrust Complaint Against Reliance Jio and 4,500 Firms
Jul 19, 2026 by
CPI
Apple Opens Early Settlement Discussions With DOJ
Jul 17, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Antitrust Compliance
Jul 20, 2026 by
CPI
Your Antitrust Compliance Program: A Strong Voice in Your Defense
Jul 20, 2026 by
Joe Murphy
Antitrust Compliance for the AI Pricing Era
Jul 20, 2026 by
Alejandra Uria & Andre Geverola
Race to Report: Antitrust Leniency in the Whistleblower Era
Jul 20, 2026 by
Brian R. Faerstein & Nicole H. Sprinzen
Antitrust-By-Design: Competition Compliance in Digital Markets
Jul 20, 2026 by
Marcos Drummond Malvar, Gabriela Costa Carvalho Forsman & Luciana Mendes