New filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission have offered new insight into a longstanding battle with a disgruntled shareholder who sued over plans for banks Roma Financial and Investors Bancorp to merge. Those documents provide further details on how the potential deal first came to the table; according to the papers, the deal to buy Roma, which was struggling at the time, was made for $524 million in an all-stock deal. But shareholder Joseph Zalescik initiated a putative class-action filed in January over the deal, arguing the merger undervalued Roma and limited competition by making it difficult for Roma to find competing offers. To settle the case, the banks agreed to release more detailed information about the deal to shareholders; a vote is set for May 30 to approve of the deal.
Featured News
Trump Administration Defends Pentagon Blacklisting of AI Firm Anthropic in Court Filing
Mar 18, 2026 by
CPI
BMG Sues Anthropic Over Alleged Use of Song Lyrics in AI Training
Mar 18, 2026 by
CPI
Google Proposes New Search Controls Amid UK Competition Scrutiny
Mar 18, 2026 by
CPI
US Appeals Court Revives Whistleblower Case Against Major Drugmakers Over Pricing Program
Mar 18, 2026 by
CPI
Possible Compromise Emerging on Stablecoin Yield Payments in Senate Market-Structure Bill
Mar 18, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Data-Driven Competition
Mar 19, 2026 by
CPI
Data-Driven Competition: Implications For Enforcement and Merger Control
Mar 19, 2026 by
Alexandre de Corniere & Greg Taylor
From Tipping to Trustees: Why Data-Driven Markets Require Institutional Design, Not Optimization
Mar 19, 2026 by
Jens Prüfer & Paul de Bijl
Data Barriers to Entry: What We’ve Learned About Spotting Them and What We Still Don’t Know About Solutions
Mar 19, 2026 by
Bruno Carballa-Smichowski
When the Perfect Is the Enemy of the Good: Price Discrimination, Affordability, Precarity and Market Dynamism
Mar 19, 2026 by
Dan Ciuriak