A PYMNTS Company

Once allies against Microsoft, two lawyers clashed over Google antitrust case

By  |  January 4, 2013

In a 1996 landmark antitrust case against Microsoft, lawyers Gary L. Reback and Susan A. Creighton were a crucial duo in building a case against the tech corporation. But before the recently-announced settlement between the U.S. Federal Trade Commission and Google – another major, longstanding case – Reback and Creighton parted ways due to disagreements as to whether Google’s business practices were an abuse of dominance. According to the report, Reback argued in the case against Google and viewed the search giant as a bully against smaller companies in the way it presents its search results, Creighton, however, testified before Congress in favor of Google as well as argued in Google’s favor to the FTC, arguing Google’s practices were “far from threatening competition.” The Federal Trade Commission recently voted 5-0 to end the antitrust case against Google, signaling no violation of antitrust law on Google’s part.

    Get the Full Story

    Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

    yesSubscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

    By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

     

    We’d love to be your preferred source for news.

    Please add us to your preferred sources list so our news, data and interviews show up in your feed. Thanks!

    Add as Preferred Source

    Full Content: New York Times

    Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.