William Kolasky, Apr 30, 2009
A senior official in the Bush Antitrust Division has defended [recent] judicial decisions as signaling not less antitrust, but better antitrust. How the Chicago School Overshot the Mark seeks to debate this proposition. The contributors to the book, which include some of the nations most distinguished antitrust scholars, argue forcefully that while many of the Supreme Courts decisions over the last 30 years were a necessary midcourse correction from the overly interventionist antitrust jurisprudence of the Supreme Court during Earl Warren´s tenure as Chief Justice, the federal antitrust agencies and the courts have now overshot the mark in adopting too laissez-faire an approach to antitrust enforcement. More importantly, they seek to offer specific proposals for reinvigorating antitrust enforcement, something Barack Obama has promised that his administration will do. With his new administration having just taken office in January, this book could not be more timely.
Featured News
White House Cybersecurity Plan Calls on Private Sector to Partner on US Operations
Mar 9, 2026 by
CPI
Big Tech Data Centers Become Wartime Targets After Drone Strikes on Amazon Sites
Mar 9, 2026 by
CPI
Anthropic Sues Pentagon to Block National Security Blacklist Over AI Restrictions
Mar 9, 2026 by
CPI
US Authorities Expand Probe Into CrowdStrike Deal With Technology Distributor
Mar 9, 2026 by
CPI
A $300 Billion Crypto Market Is Propping Up US Government Debt
Mar 9, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Behavioral Economics
Feb 22, 2026 by
CPI
Behavioral Antitrust in 2026
Feb 22, 2026 by
Maurice Stucke
Behavioral Economics in Competition Policy: Going Beyond Inertia and Framing Effects
Feb 22, 2026 by
Annemieke Tuinstra & Richard May
Agreeing to Disagree in Antitrust
Feb 22, 2026 by
Jorge Padilla
Recognizing What’s Around the Corner: Merger Control, Capabilities, and the New Nature of Potential Competition
Feb 22, 2026 by
Magdalena Kuyterink & David J. Teece