Bernhard Friess, Sean Greenaway, Apr 01, 2006
The structure of trading service markets is a fundamental determinant of the cost of capital for business. Competition has an important role to play in delivering efficiencies, particularly in the context of inherited fragmentation that characterizes the European Union, and to this end regulation and competition policy need to go hand in hand. Despite the complexity of the sector, competition authorities need to be alert to the problems that it poses. The authors argue that competition between trading platforms is welfare-enhancing but often foreclosed, both by private and state measures. In clearing, the authors take the view that compatibility is needed but unlikely to arise endogenously. In settlement, finally, the authors tentatively conclude that agency does not influence rents available to central securities depositories (CSDs), but may add value by keeping custody markets contestable.
Featured News
Live Nation Nears Settlement in Federal Antitrust Case Over Ticketmaster
Mar 9, 2026 by
CPI
UK Government Delays Planned AI Copyright Reforms After Creative Industry Backlash
Mar 8, 2026 by
CPI
Trump Administration Drafts Strict AI Contract Rules Amid Pentagon Dispute With Anthropic
Mar 8, 2026 by
CPI
New Pentagon Data Chief Takes Post During Fight Over Military AI Guardrails
Mar 8, 2026 by
CPI
Judge Throws Out Poultry Rendering Monopoly Case Filed by American Proteins
Mar 8, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Behavioral Economics
Feb 22, 2026 by
CPI
Behavioral Antitrust in 2026
Feb 22, 2026 by
Maurice Stucke
Behavioral Economics in Competition Policy: Going Beyond Inertia and Framing Effects
Feb 22, 2026 by
Annemieke Tuinstra & Richard May
Agreeing to Disagree in Antitrust
Feb 22, 2026 by
Jorge Padilla
Recognizing What’s Around the Corner: Merger Control, Capabilities, and the New Nature of Potential Competition
Feb 22, 2026 by
Magdalena Kuyterink & David J. Teece