Joseph Farrell, Michael Katz, Nov 01, 2006
There has been considerable debate concerning whether consumer surplus or total surplus should be the welfare standard for antitrust. This debate misses two critical issues. First, antitrust is not straightforwardly welfarist. It does not maximize but protects, and it does not forbid all actions that seem likely to lower some welfare measure. Second, the enforcement process involves multiple steps and multiple decision makers. The authors conclude that, while some popular arguments for a consumer surplus standard are weak, other arguments have some merit.
Featured News
US Appeals Court Tosses FTC Order Over Intuit’s “Free” TurboTax Ads
Mar 22, 2026 by
CPI
Jury Finds Musk Liable for Misleading Twitter Shareholders During Takeover Fight
Mar 22, 2026 by
CPI
FTC Launches Healthcare Task Force to Sharpen Enforcement
Mar 22, 2026 by
CPI
White House Pushes Congress for National AI Law to Override State Rules
Mar 22, 2026 by
CPI
Anthropic Copyright Settlement Lawyers Cut Fee Request to $187.5 Million
Mar 22, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Data-Driven Competition
Mar 19, 2026 by
CPI
Data-Driven Competition: Implications For Enforcement and Merger Control
Mar 19, 2026 by
Alexandre de Corniere & Greg Taylor
From Tipping to Trustees: Why Data-Driven Markets Require Institutional Design, Not Optimization
Mar 19, 2026 by
Jens Prüfer & Paul de Bijl
Data Barriers to Entry: What We’ve Learned About Spotting Them and What We Still Don’t Know About Solutions
Mar 19, 2026 by
Bruno Carballa-Smichowski
When the Perfect Is the Enemy of the Good: Price Discrimination, Affordability, Precarity and Market Dynamism
Mar 19, 2026 by
Dan Ciuriak