A federal judge has dismissed a longrunning lawsuit alleging an industry-wide scheme to fix beef prices in the U.S., bringing relief to meatpacking giants Cargill Inc., JBS SA, Tyson Foods Inc., National Beef Packing Co., and Swift Beef Co.
The claims were made by a putative class of cattle ranchers who indirectly sell them cattle via intermediaries. The ranchers alleged in an October 2022 lawsuit that the meatpacking giants were deliberately manipulating the volume of beef on the market to increase prices. According to the ranchers, this had caused a severe decrease in the supply of beef in 2015.
The meatpackers were accused of violating the Sherman Act’s provisions against price-fixing and market allocation and the Packers and Stockyards Act in addition to two sets of state antitrust and consumer protection laws. US District Court for the District of Minnesota Judge John R. Tunheim dismissed the claims, however, stating that the ranchers had failed to establish adequate standing for their case. “They did not plausibly allege a causal relationship between Defendants’ conduct and their injury, or that their injury and damages are in fact traceable to Defendants’ actions,” he decreed.
He also added that there are too many stages in the beef supply chain and too much time between the ranchers’ sale of cows and the meatpackers’ purchase of them, to grant the requested standing for the Sherman Act and Packer and Stockyards claims. Judge Tunheim dismissed the charges of the meatpackers under the various state laws, and denied the ranchers leave to amend the complaint. Though the court has yet to decide whether to grant leave to amend, it has promised to consider any plans proposed by the ranchers to combat the standing issues.
The federal judge’s decision will come as a relief to the meatpacking giants, who have faced years of litigation for their alleged market manipulation. The future, however, remains uncertain as the ranchers continue to fight for justice.
Source: News Bloomberg Law
Featured News
Uruguayan Antitrust Scrutiny Puts Major Meatpacking Deal Between Marfrig and Minerva on Hold
May 19, 2024 by
CPI
Alaska Airlines Seeks Dismissal of Consumer Lawsuit Over $1.9 Billion Hawaiian Airlines Buy
May 19, 2024 by
CPI
Idaho Attorney General Orders Split of Kootenai Health and Syringa Hospital
May 19, 2024 by
CPI
Court Rejects T-Mobile’s Appeal Bid in Antitrust Case Over Sprint Merger
May 19, 2024 by
CPI
Google Requests Judge, Not Jury, to Decide on Antitrust Case
May 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Ecosystems
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Mapping Antitrust onto Digital Ecosystems
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Ecosystems and Competition Law: A Law and Political Economy Approach
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Ecosystem Theories of Harm: What is Beyond the Buzzword?
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Open Ecosystems: Benefits, Challenges, and Implications for Antitrust
May 9, 2024 by
CPI