The U.S. Supreme Court has sought the Biden administration’s input on whether it should entertain the U.S. Soccer Federation’s plea to dismiss a lawsuit accusing it of colluding with FIFA to prohibit foreign teams from playing official matches in the United States. The case, brought by New York-based Relevent Sports in 2019, alleges that the ban violates American antitrust laws.
Relevent Sports’ lawsuit targets both U.S. Soccer and FIFA, asserting that the ban infringes on antitrust regulations, and it aims to halt the implementation of such a prohibition. While U.S. Soccer is a member of FIFA, it contends that it played no role in formulating FIFA’s 2018 policy that prevents foreign clubs from conducting competitive matches outside their home countries, per Reuters.
Read more: EU Football Agents Callout FIFA For “Cartel Activity”
The dispute reached the Supreme Court after a federal judge dismissed Relevent’s suit in 2021. However, the New York-based 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals reinstated the case in March of this year. The appellate court ruled that U.S. Soccer could be held accountable if FIFA’s rule is found to violate antitrust laws, emphasizing that U.S. Soccer, as a FIFA member, agreed to abide by the international body’s rules.
According to Reuters, the outcome of this legal battle has potential ramifications for the landscape of international soccer in the United States. Currently, the U.S. hosts “friendly” matches involving foreign professional teams, but a favorable ruling for Relevent Sports could pave the way for hosting more significant matches, involving prominent professional clubs and players from around the world.
The Supreme Court’s consideration of U.S. Soccer’s appeal reflects the ongoing challenge in U.S. courts to determine how antitrust laws apply to members of organizations or associations based on shared rules and memberships.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Uruguayan Antitrust Scrutiny Puts Major Meatpacking Deal Between Marfrig and Minerva on Hold
May 19, 2024 by
CPI
Alaska Airlines Seeks Dismissal of Consumer Lawsuit Over $1.9 Billion Hawaiian Airlines Buy
May 19, 2024 by
CPI
Idaho Attorney General Orders Split of Kootenai Health and Syringa Hospital
May 19, 2024 by
CPI
Court Rejects T-Mobile’s Appeal Bid in Antitrust Case Over Sprint Merger
May 19, 2024 by
CPI
Google Requests Judge, Not Jury, to Decide on Antitrust Case
May 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Ecosystems
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Mapping Antitrust onto Digital Ecosystems
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Ecosystems and Competition Law: A Law and Political Economy Approach
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Ecosystem Theories of Harm: What is Beyond the Buzzword?
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Open Ecosystems: Benefits, Challenges, and Implications for Antitrust
May 9, 2024 by
CPI