
Allergan and a group of drug distributors got the nod from a federal judge in Brooklyn for their US$51 million settlement of allegations that the company used bogus patents and sham litigation to delay generic competition for the dry-eye treatment Restasis, reported Bloomberg Law.
Judge Nina Gershon granted final approval to the agreement resolving proposed class action antitrust claims on behalf of “direct purchasers,” led by large wholesalers and retailers like Meijer.
The judge also approved US$16.4 million in attorneys’ fees and just shy of US$2 million in litigation costs for class counsel.
The antitrust suit accuses Allergan of “inundating” the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) with bad faith “citizen petitions” challenging the safety of Restasis generics proposed by other drugmakers. After the FDA rejected the petitions, Allergan allegedly launched bogus lawsuits claiming its would-be competitors infringed patents it had intentionally mischaracterized to regulators.
Featured News
FTC Withdraws Case Against Microsoft-Activision Merger, Citing Public Interest
May 23, 2025 by
CPI
Charter to Acquire Cox Communications in $35 Billion Deal
May 22, 2025 by
CPI
FTC Targets Media Watchdog Over Alleged Collusion Against Musk’s X
May 22, 2025 by
CPI
FTC Drops Antitrust Case Accusing Pepsi of Squeezing Small Retailers
May 22, 2025 by
CPI
Shein Warns of Higher Costs for French Shoppers Amid EU Fee Proposal
May 22, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Industrial Policy
May 21, 2025 by
CPI
Industrial Strategy and the Role of Competition – Taking a Business Lens
May 21, 2025 by
Marcus Bokkerink
Industrial Policy, Antitrust, and Economic Growth: Some Observations
May 21, 2025 by
David S. Evans
Bolder by Design: Crafting Pro-Competitive Industrial Policies For Complex Challenges
May 21, 2025 by
Antonio Capobianco & Beatriz Marques
Competition-Friendly Industrial Policy
May 21, 2025 by
Philippe Aghion, Mathias Dewatripont & Patrick Legros