
Rhode Island federal judge has ruled that American Express will not be able to block a class action lawsuit filed by small merchants, who allege that the company overcharged them for credit and debit card transaction fees in violation of U.S. antitrust law.
In a decision made earlier this week, U.S. District Judge Mary McElroy rejected American Express’s attempt to force the merchants to pursue their claims individually rather than as a collective class. The lawsuit, initially filed in March, involves ten small businesses accusing the financial giant of enforcing “non-discrimination provisions” that prevent merchants from steering customers toward payment methods that charge lower transaction fees.
The plaintiffs contend that these provisions unfairly inflate the cost of credit card payments for businesses, thus violating antitrust laws designed to promote fair competition. The merchants are seeking a formal declaration that American Express’s practices constitute an illegal restraint of trade.
American Express, which did not respond to a request for comment on the ruling, had previously sought to have the case handled on an individual basis, arguing that the claims were too varied for a class action. However, Judge McElroy’s decision ensures that the merchants will have the opportunity to pursue the case collectively.
Attorneys representing the plaintiffs expressed satisfaction with the court’s ruling. In a statement, they emphasized that the decision would allow small businesses to bring their case to court, after struggling to resolve the issue through arbitration. More than 5,000 merchants had previously sought to arbitrate their claims against American Express, but the process was halted when the company declined to pay over $17 million in filing fees for the mass arbitration. The arbitrator subsequently closed the proceeding due to the nonpayment, as noted by Judge McElroy in her ruling.
Source: Economic Times
Featured News
EU Commission Refers Five Member States to Court Over Digital Services Act Shortcomings
May 7, 2025 by
CPI
DOJ, FTC Open Public Comment on Ticketing Practices
May 7, 2025 by
CPI
It’s Down to the Wire on Senate Stablecoin Bill
May 7, 2025 by
CPI
South Korea’s Supreme Court Upholds FTC Fines in Major Shipping Antitrust Case
May 7, 2025 by
CPI
Debate Heats Up Over DOJ’s Antitrust Lawsuit Against AI Pricing Firm RealPage
May 7, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Mergers in Digital Markets
Apr 21, 2025 by
CPI
Catching a Killer? Six “Genetic Markers” to Assess Nascent Competitor Acquisitions
Apr 21, 2025 by
John Taladay & Christine Ryu-Naya
Digital Decoded: Is There More Scope for Digital Mergers In 2025?
Apr 21, 2025 by
Colin Raftery, Michele Davis, Sarah Jensen & Martin Dickson
AI In the Mix – An Ever-Evolving Approach to Jurisdiction Over Digital Mergers in Europe
Apr 21, 2025 by
Ingrid Vandenborre & Ketevan Zukakishvili
Antitrust Enforcement Errors Due to a Failure to Understand Organizational Capabilities and Dynamic Competition
Apr 21, 2025 by
Magdalena Kuyterink & David J. Teece