During the hearing held on last November 23rd, the Tribunal of the Administrative Council for Economic Defense – CADE condemned the companies Elpida Memory, Mitsubishi Electric, Nanya Technology Corporation, NEC Corporation and Toshiba Corporation, beyond two individuals, for cartel formation in the international market of Dynamic Random Access Memory – DRAM. The fines imposed sum up to BRL 7 million (Administrative Proceeding 08012.005255/2010-11).
The cartel in the DRAM market was also investigated in other jurisdictions. Several participants of the cartel agreed to plead guilty to participating in a global conspiracy to manipulate DRAM market to US and EU antitrust authorities. They also agreed to pay high fines and to assist prosecutors in the investigation.
Besides, cartel participants faced several claims of compensation regarding damage recovering. In the United States, for example, Hitachi, Mitsubishi Electric and Toshiba payed more than US$ 27 million to settle private lawsuits over DRAM conspiracy.
The Dynamic Random Access Memory are used in personal computers – as PCs, notebooks and laptops –, workstations, mainframes, calculators, GPS devices, game consoles, digital recorders, printing machines and scanners, among other pieces of equipment.
The DRAM cartel affected Brazil and harmed companies that bought DRAM from the parties involved in the cartel as well as final consumers of goods that used DRAM chips in their manufacturing process. The collusion harmed Brazilian and foreign consumers at least between 1998 e 2002.
Full Content: CADE
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Mastercard to Acquire Cybersecurity Firm Recorded Future for $2.65 Billion
Sep 12, 2024 by
CPI
Ireland Prime Minister: Apple’s €13 Billion Payment Could Fund Housing and Capital Projects
Sep 12, 2024 by
CPI
Regulators Probe Swisscom’s $8.8 Billion Vodafone Italia Deal
Sep 12, 2024 by
CPI
Amazon and Flipkart Breached Competition Laws, Indian Regulators Report
Sep 12, 2024 by
CPI
Google ExecAdmitted Firm’s Goal Was to “Crush” Digital Ad Rivals, According to Court Docs
Sep 11, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Canada & Mexico
Sep 3, 2024 by
CPI
Competitive Convergence: Mexico’s 30-Year Quest for Antitrust Parity with its Northern Neighbor
Sep 3, 2024 by
Francisco Javier Núñez Melgoza
Competition and Digital Markets in North America: A Comparative Study of Antitrust Investigations in Mexico and the United States
Sep 3, 2024 by
Julio Garcia
Recent Antitrust Development in Mexico: COFECE’s Preliminary Report on Amazon and Mercado Libre
Sep 3, 2024 by
Alejandra Palacios Prieto
The Cost of Making COFECE Disappear
Sep 3, 2024 by
Mateo Fernández