California is considering three legislative options to overhaul its antitrust law and sanction single‑firm conduct through European‑style “exclusionary” theories of harm. Such a break from U.S. antitrust jurisprudence would bias enforcement toward costly false positives, chill innovation, and ultimately harm consumers. Each option would invite more aggressive enforcement by expanding the scope of cognizable harm and crippling key constraints of current U.S. antitrust jurisprudence, inclu
...THIS ARTICLE IS NOT AVAILABLE FOR IP ADDRESS 18.97.9.171
Please verify email or join us to access premium content!