A PYMNTS Company

Microsoft Wins Partial Dismissal of ChatGPT Users’ Antitrust Case

 |  September 29, 2026
Microsoft Wins Partial Dismissal of ChatGPT Users’ Antitrust Case

Microsoft Corp. won a partial victory in a proposed class action brought by ChatGPT subscribers after a federal judge dismissed an antitrust claim alleging that the technology company’s relationship with OpenAI harmed competition and contributed to higher prices.

    Get the Full Story

    Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

    Subscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

    By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

    US District Judge P. Casey Pitts in California dismissed the subscribers’ antitrust claim while allowing them an opportunity to amend their allegations, according to Law360. The judge, however, rejected Microsoft’s attempt to send the dispute to arbitration, leaving portions of the litigation in federal court.

    We’d love to be your preferred source for news.

    Please add us to your preferred sources list so our news, data and interviews show up in your feed. Thanks!

    The case centers on allegations that Microsoft used its commercial relationship with OpenAI to constrain the artificial-intelligence company’s access to computing infrastructure. The plaintiffs contend that arrangements between the companies restricted OpenAI’s output and imposed a price floor on ChatGPT products, according to Law360 and related coverage of the litigation.

    Read more: AI Copyright Fight Expands as Regional Newspapers Target OpenAI, Microsoft

    Pitts concluded that the subscribers had not adequately shown the type of injury required to sustain their antitrust claim. The plaintiffs are consumers of generative-AI services rather than rival cloud-computing suppliers allegedly prevented from selling capacity to OpenAI or competing AI providers allegedly denied access to computing resources, according to a summary of the ruling reported by MLex and Law360.

    Source: Law360