Corinne Chew, R. Ian McEwin, Nov 05, 2010
The Baidu case, one of the first abuse of dominance cases in China, is important in several respects. First, it was one of the first private competition law actions in China. Second, the judgment was read out in a real-time broadcast. Third, the legal reasoning was more detailed than in other competition law cases. Fourth, the Court stressed the importance of economic reasoning and evidence in deciding such cases. This paper analyzes both the facts of the case and its significance.
Featured News
States Move to Rein In Crypto Kiosks as Fraud Concerns Mount
Apr 29, 2026 by
CPI
Italian Drugmaker to Buy KalVista for $1.9 Billion
Apr 29, 2026 by
CPI
France Flags Systemic Rule Violations in Online Marketplaces Amid EU Crackdown
Apr 29, 2026 by
CPI
NCAA Agrees to End Prize Money Restrictions in Settlement with Tennis Players
Apr 29, 2026 by
CPI
South Korea Regulator’s Move on Coupang Founder Triggers Planned Lawsuit
Apr 29, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Unilateral Effects
Apr 28, 2026 by
CPI
A Net Present Value Approach to Merger Analysis
Apr 28, 2026 by
Joseph J Simons & Malcolm Coate
Generative AI and Competitive Disruption: Increasingly Relevant for Merger Analysis?
Apr 28, 2026 by
Andrea Coscelli, Emily Chissell, Nitika Bagaria & Tega Akati-Udi
Non-Price Unilateral Effects In Media Mergers
Apr 28, 2026 by
Lapo Filistrucchi & Teresa Oriani
Ecosystem Mergers and Unilateral Effects? A Framework for Assessing the Ecosystem Theory of Harm
Apr 28, 2026 by
Ethel Fonseca, George Tucker & Helder Vasconcelos