Corinne Chew, R. Ian McEwin, Nov 05, 2010
The Baidu case, one of the first abuse of dominance cases in China, is important in several respects. First, it was one of the first private competition law actions in China. Second, the judgment was read out in a real-time broadcast. Third, the legal reasoning was more detailed than in other competition law cases. Fourth, the Court stressed the importance of economic reasoning and evidence in deciding such cases. This paper analyzes both the facts of the case and its significance.
Featured News
UK Competition Regulator Hit by Further Boardroom Departures
Nov 11, 2025 by
CPI
Parker-Hannifin Bets $9.25 Billion on Industrial Filtration Growth
Nov 11, 2025 by
CPI
Judge Grants Preliminary Approval to Tyson’s $85 Million Pork Price-Fixing Settlement
Nov 11, 2025 by
CPI
Senate Bill to End Shutdown Includes Extension to Cyber-Information Sharing Protections
Nov 11, 2025 by
CPI
Momentum Slowed For State Privacy Legislation in 2025, but Enforcement Ramped Up
Nov 11, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Costs of Consolidation
Oct 26, 2025 by
CPI
Does Merger Enforcement Protect Consumers from the Long-Term Costs of Consolidation?
Oct 26, 2025 by
Diana L. Moss
“Praying for Inflation”: How Market Concentration Facilitates Inflationary Pressures
Oct 26, 2025 by
John Kwoka & Muhammad Shabanpour
Unpacking the Remedy: The Hidden Costs of Merger Remedies and the Economist’s Role in Getting Them Right
Oct 26, 2025 by
Sam R. Carless, Mary Coleman & David Weiskopf
Why Industry Consolidation Causes More Concern Than It Should
Oct 26, 2025 by
Michael Noel