Corinne Chew, R. Ian McEwin, Nov 05, 2010
The Baidu case, one of the first abuse of dominance cases in China, is important in several respects. First, it was one of the first private competition law actions in China. Second, the judgment was read out in a real-time broadcast. Third, the legal reasoning was more detailed than in other competition law cases. Fourth, the Court stressed the importance of economic reasoning and evidence in deciding such cases. This paper analyzes both the facts of the case and its significance.
Featured News
Latham Expands Antitrust Practice With Paris Partner Hire
Sep 20, 2026 by
CPI
China Opens Competition Probes Into Meituan, Alibaba Travel Units
Sep 20, 2026 by
CPI
US Judiciary Prepares New AI Guidance for Federal Courts
Sep 20, 2026 by
CPI
EU Regulators Poised to Block UPM-Sappi Paper Venture
Sep 20, 2026 by
CPI
Paramount Nears Deal With California Officials Over $111 Billion WBD Acquisition
Sep 20, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Computational Antitrust
Sep 16, 2026 by
CPI
The Next Five Years of Computational Antitrust
Sep 16, 2026 by
Thibault Schrepel
When Two AI Agents Talk: A Gap in Detection Capabilities
Sep 16, 2026 by
Alba Ribera Martinez
When Innovation Competition Has No Product Yet: Making General Innovation Competition Operational
Sep 16, 2026 by
Mariateresa Maggiolino
Computational Antitrust for Complex Adaptive Markets
Sep 16, 2026 by
Filip Lubinski