Corinne Chew, R. Ian McEwin, Nov 05, 2010
The Baidu case, one of the first abuse of dominance cases in China, is important in several respects. First, it was one of the first private competition law actions in China. Second, the judgment was read out in a real-time broadcast. Third, the legal reasoning was more detailed than in other competition law cases. Fourth, the Court stressed the importance of economic reasoning and evidence in deciding such cases. This paper analyzes both the facts of the case and its significance.
Links to Full Content
Featured News
NCAA Antitrust Settlement Clears First Approval Stage
May 21, 2024 by
CPI
Justice Department’s Antitrust Chief Celebrates Merger Stoppages
May 21, 2024 by
CPI
Scarlett Johansson Accuses OpenAI of Mimicking Her Voice for ChatGPT
May 21, 2024 by
CPI
Brazil’s Central Bank Announces Phased Approach to Crypto Regulation
May 21, 2024 by
CPI
Romania’s Competition Authority Approves Acquisition of Meat Product Retailers by Abatorul Peris
May 21, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Merger Guidelines Retrospective
May 21, 2024 by
CPI
Mergers of Complements
May 21, 2024 by
CPI
Personality Traits, Private Equity, and Merger Analysis
May 21, 2024 by
CPI
The 2023 Merger Guidelines: Lessons in the Importance of Incipiency, Modern Economics, and Monopsony
May 21, 2024 by
CPI
The 2023 Merger Guidelines: Sharpening Merger Analysis
May 21, 2024 by
CPI