Europe’s top court will rule on Thursday whether Danish drugmaker Lundbeck breached EU antitrust rules by paying smaller rivals to delay generic copies of its blockbuster citalopram anti-depressant from entering the market.
The cases, among several before the Luxembourg-based Court of Justice of the European Union, are being closely watched by the pharmaceuticals industry fighting to preserve a longstanding business practice.
Antitrust authorities on both sides of the Atlantic have been investigating pay-for-delay deals for several years, prompted in part by the high costs borne by cash-strapped national health systems.
In June 2013 the European Commission said such agreements were anti-competitive as it imposed a $164 million fine on Lundbeck and eight other drugmakers including Ranbaxy Laboratories, which was later acquired by India’s largest drugmaker Sun Pharmaceutical Industries.
Lundbeck, Merck KGaA, Generics, Arrow Group, Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Xellia Pharmaceuticals and Alpharma later took their cases to court. Judges will rule on all six cases on Thursday. The industry says pay-for-delay deals prevent costly and lengthy litigation.
“The Commission sees some of these deals as undercover market sharing arrangements whereby the brand and the generic manufacturer may share monopoly rents instead of competing,” said lawyer Alfonso Lamadrid at Garrigues.
The Commission’s decisions followed an inquiry into the sector in 2008-2009. Israeli drugmaker Teva Pharmaceutical Industries and France’s Servier have also challenged the decisions and fines in separate but similar cases.
Full Content: Daily Mail
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
House Budget Bill’s Moratorium on State AI Laws Could Undo A Range of Tech Regs, Critics Say
May 14, 2025 by
CPI
Microsoft Nears EU Antitrust Resolution Over Teams Bundling, Sources Say
May 14, 2025 by
CPI
CMA Investigates Aviva’s £3.6B Acquisition of Direct Line Group
May 14, 2025 by
CPI
Google Urges Texas Judge to Disregard Virginia Antitrust Ruling
May 14, 2025 by
CPI
Anthropic Ordered to Respond After AI Allegedly Fabricates Citation in Legal Filing
May 14, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Healthcare Antitrust
May 14, 2025 by
CPI
Healthcare & Antitrust: What to Expect in the New Trump Administration
May 14, 2025 by
Nana Wilberforce, John W O'Toole & Sarah Pugh
Patent Gaming and Disparagement: Commission Fines Teva For Improperly Protecting Its Blockbuster Medicine
May 14, 2025 by
Blaž Višnar, Boris Andrejaš, Apostolos Baltzopoulos, Rieke Kaup, Laura Nistor & Gianluca Vassallo
Strategic Alliances in the Pharma Sector: An EU Competition Law Perspective
May 14, 2025 by
Christian Ritz & Benedikt Weiss
Monopsony Power in the Hospital Labor Market
May 14, 2025 by
Kevin E. Pflum & Christian Salas