A PYMNTS Company

EU: EC must pay for delay in deciding antitrust case

 |  June 7, 2017

Europe’s general court on Wednesday ordered the European Union to pay a glass company over $730,000 in damages due to the excessive length of antitrust proceedings against the company.

    Get the Full Story

    Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

    yesSubscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

    By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

    In 2007, the European Commission fined Guardian Industries and Guardian Europe $167 million for the role in a glass cartel. The companies appealed the fine the following year, which the European General Court took 4 1/2 years to dismiss.

    The companies then lodged a final appeal with the European Court of Justice, which in 2014 reduced the fine to $117 million.

    Guardian Europe then sued the European Union, seeking damages of over $19 million for the general court’s delay in deciding the initial appeal and $28 million for the prejudice it suffered as a result of the lower court’s excessive fine.

    In a ruling issued Wednesday, an en banc general court agreed it had taken too long to hear Guardian’s appeal – 41 months from filing to oral arguments, far beyond the case-law standard of 15 months from filing to oral arguments.

    The Luxembourg-based court further held the circumstances of the case didn’t justify the delay of 26 months above the court’s standard. But the justices balked at Guardian Europe’s $19 million demand, finding the only remedy appropriate is to pay the company’s bank-guarantee costs with respect to the commission’s fine: just over $730,000.

    As to Guardian Europe’s claim that it had been prejudiced by a fine that was eventually found to be excessive, the general court noted the fine had been substantially reduced by the EU high court – erasing the company’s claim of prejudice.

    Full Content: Courthouse News

    Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.