EU Probes Nvidia Over Alleged Bundling Practices Amid Run:ai Acquisition Scrutiny

European Union antitrust regulators are delving into Nvidia’s business practices as part of their investigation into the company’s proposed $700 million acquisition of Run:ai, a provider of AI orchestration software. According to Reuters, the European Commission has distributed a questionnaire to Nvidia customers, seeking insights into whether the company has been offering discounts to those who purchase its GPU software and hardware as a package.
The inquiry highlights the EU’s concerns about Nvidia’s dominant position in the graphics processing unit (GPU) market, where it controls approximately 84%, significantly outpacing competitors Intel and AMD. GPUs are vital components used for a wide array of applications, including data centers, gaming consoles, and cryptocurrency mining.
The European Commission’s questionnaire reportedly probes whether bundling GPU software with hardware gives Nvidia an undue competitive advantage. It also inquires whether end-users have felt compelled to purchase such bundles due to pricing incentives, such as discounts.
Related: EU to Decide on Nvidia’s Acquisition of Israeli AI Startup Run:ai by December 20
The Commission has already expressed apprehension that the Nvidia-Run:ai deal could harm competition in relevant markets. A preliminary review of the acquisition is set to conclude by December 20, according to Reuters.
Regulators have also sought feedback on alternative scenarios, asking respondents about the potential business impact if Nvidia were to make Run:ai’s software open-source. This question underscores the EU’s focus on whether the acquisition could restrict market access or reinforce Nvidia’s market power.
Nvidia’s proposed acquisition of Run:ai comes at a time when competition regulators are increasingly vigilant about the consolidation of power in the tech sector. The outcome of the EU’s review could set a significant precedent for similar deals in the industry.
The Commission’s findings will likely shape the regulatory landscape for high-tech mergers, particularly in markets characterized by rapid innovation and concentrated market shares.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
CFPB Allows Some Operations to Resume Amid Legal Challenge
Mar 6, 2025 by
CPI
NASCAR Accuses Michael Jordan’s Race Team of Illegal Cartel in Legal Battle
Mar 6, 2025 by
CPI
Healthcare Providers Sue BCBS Insurers Over Alleged Collusion
Mar 6, 2025 by
CPI
Indian Distributors File Antitrust Case Against Quick-Delivery Giants
Mar 6, 2025 by
CPI
EU Lawmakers Send Letter Rejecting Claims of Bias in Digital Rules
Mar 6, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Self-Preferencing
Feb 26, 2025 by
CPI
Platform Self-Preferencing: Focusing the Policy Debate
Feb 26, 2025 by
Michael Katz
Weaponized Opacity: Self-Preferencing in Digital Audience Measurement
Feb 26, 2025 by
Thomas Hoppner & Philipp Westerhoff
Self-Preferencing: An Economic Literature-Based Assessment Advocating a Case-By-Case Approach and Compliance Requirements
Feb 26, 2025 by
Patrice Bougette & Frederic Marty
Self-Preferencing in Adjacent Markets
Feb 26, 2025 by
Muxin Li