The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is stepping back from an agreement between federal agencies designed to collaborate on labor-related issues during the review of mergers and acquisitions, according to a Bloomberg report.
The FTC announced late on Friday that it would be withdrawing from the memorandum of understanding (MOU) it entered into in August alongside the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), the Department of Labor (DOL), and the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) antitrust division. This agreement, which aimed to foster closer collaboration, allowed the agencies to share information with one another and engage with external stakeholders to better assess the labor implications of mergers. The FTC did not provide a specific reason for its decision to exit the pact.
However, in its statement, the commission emphasized that it will “continue to closely scrutinize all issues related to mergers, including potential impacts on labor, in accordance with its merger guidelines.” Despite the withdrawal, the FTC is expected to continue its strong stance on scrutinizing the effects of mergers on labor markets, a focus it has embraced under Chair Lina Khan.
Read more: FTC Fights Back Against Florida Court Ruling on Noncompete Regulation
Khan’s tenure has been marked by a push to expand the scope of antitrust regulation to consider broader factors beyond traditional concerns like price and efficiency, including labor market impacts. In recent years, the FTC has challenged several high-profile mergers, citing potential harms to workers in addition to consumers.
The MOU, originally signed on August 28, outlined plans for biannual meetings between the agencies to coordinate efforts on labor issues, including joint training sessions on the intersections between labor and antitrust law. Despite the FTC’s withdrawal, it remains unclear how the remaining agencies—NLRB, DOL, and DOJ—will continue their collaborative efforts moving forward.
Source: Bloomberg
Featured News
Judge Dismisses Antitrust Lawsuit Against Ivy League Over Athletic Scholarships
Oct 11, 2024 by
CPI
FTC and DOJ Revamp Merger Guidelines to Identify Illegal Transactions More Efficiently
Oct 11, 2024 by
CPI
US Consumer Watchdog Eyes Expansion of ‘Junk Fee’ Crackdown Ahead of 2024 Election
Oct 10, 2024 by
CPI
Brazil Proposes Reform to Competition Law Targeting Big Tech
Oct 10, 2024 by
CPI
Meta Enhances User Data Control, Resolving German Antitrust Dispute
Oct 10, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh