GameStop CEO Ryan Cohen Fined Nearly $1M for Antitrust Violation in Wells Fargo Deal
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced today that Ryan Cohen, managing partner of RC Ventures, LLC and Chairman and CEO of GameStop Corp., has agreed to pay a civil penalty of $985,320 to settle charges related to his acquisition of Wells Fargo & Company shares. According to a statement from the FTC, Cohen’s acquisition of these shares violated the Hart-Scott-Rodino (HSR) Act, a federal antitrust law designed to ensure that large transactions are reported to government authorities for review.
The complaint filed by the FTC alleges that Cohen, who is also the founder and former CEO of Chewy, Inc., purchased more than 562,000 voting securities of Wells Fargo. This acquisition brought his total holdings above the HSR filing threshold, triggering a legal obligation to file an HSR form with the federal antitrust agencies and wait for the necessary review before completing the transaction. However, Cohen reportedly failed to meet this requirement, violating the provisions of the HSR Act.
Per the FTC’s statement, the HSR Act mandates that individuals and companies must report acquisitions that surpass certain thresholds, such as the one involved in Cohen’s purchase of Wells Fargo shares. This filing allows both the FTC and the Department of Justice (DOJ) to investigate the transactions before they are finalized. Federal agencies have 30 days after a report is filed to conduct an initial review, during which time it is generally illegal to complete the transaction. The maximum civil penalty for such violations was $43,792 per day at the time Cohen made a corrective filing, per the FTC.
The complaint also outlined that Cohen’s acquisition of Wells Fargo shares was not exempt under the HSR Act’s Investment-Only Exemption, which applies to investors who acquire shares purely for passive investment purposes. Despite holding less than 10% of Wells Fargo’s voting securities, Cohen was found to have intended to influence the company’s business decisions. According to the FTC’s complaint, Cohen advocated for a board seat and regularly communicated with Wells Fargo’s leadership to provide suggestions aimed at improving the company’s operations.
The Commission’s unanimous 5-0 vote to accept the settlement and refer the matter to the DOJ underscores the severity of the violation. Per the FTC, the Department of Justice has since filed the complaint and proposed stipulated order on behalf of the FTC in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.
As part of the settlement process, the proposed order and a competitive impact statement will be published in the Federal Register in accordance with the Tunney Act. Public comments on the settlement will be accepted for a 60-day period, after which the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia will decide whether to approve the settlement, determining if it aligns with the public interest.
Source: FTC
Featured News
Judge Dismisses Antitrust Lawsuit Against Ivy League Over Athletic Scholarships
Oct 11, 2024 by
CPI
FTC and DOJ Revamp Merger Guidelines to Identify Illegal Transactions More Efficiently
Oct 11, 2024 by
CPI
US Consumer Watchdog Eyes Expansion of ‘Junk Fee’ Crackdown Ahead of 2024 Election
Oct 10, 2024 by
CPI
Brazil Proposes Reform to Competition Law Targeting Big Tech
Oct 10, 2024 by
CPI
Meta Enhances User Data Control, Resolving German Antitrust Dispute
Oct 10, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh