
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co. (HPE) and Juniper Networks Inc. are actively engaging with the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) to address antitrust concerns surrounding their proposed $14 billion merger. According to Bloomberg, representatives from both companies recently met with DOJ officials in a high-stakes effort to prevent a potential legal challenge to the deal.
The DOJ has expressed apprehension that the merger could diminish competition in the networking equipment sector, particularly affecting industry leader Cisco Systems Inc. While smaller firms also operate in this market, the DOJ views HPE and Juniper as significant innovators whose combination might reduce competitive pressures on Cisco, per Bloomberg.
Despite these concerns, HPE and Juniper have been cooperating with regulators throughout the review process. HPE’s Chief Executive Officer, Antonio Neri, previously stated that he sees no reason why the deal wouldn’t proceed, emphasizing the potential benefits for customers through improved product offerings and increased innovation.
Related: UK Clears HPE’s $14 Billion Juniper Networks Acquisition
The merger has already received unconditional approval from the European Commission, which concluded that the deal would not significantly impede competition in various networking markets. However, the DOJ has prepared a complaint and is ready to challenge the merger if the companies attempt to finalize it soon, according to Bloomberg.
A final decision on whether to file a lawsuit will be made by senior officials appointed by the Trump administration, which has reversed some decisions made by its predecessors in the Biden Justice Department. The merger agreement between HPE and Juniper extends through October 2025, providing time for further negotiations and potential adjustments to address regulatory concerns.
Source: Bloomberg
Featured News
CFPB Allows Some Operations to Resume Amid Legal Challenge
Mar 6, 2025 by
CPI
NASCAR Accuses Michael Jordan’s Race Team of Illegal Cartel in Legal Battle
Mar 6, 2025 by
CPI
Healthcare Providers Sue BCBS Insurers Over Alleged Collusion
Mar 6, 2025 by
CPI
Indian Distributors File Antitrust Case Against Quick-Delivery Giants
Mar 6, 2025 by
CPI
EU Lawmakers Send Letter Rejecting Claims of Bias in Digital Rules
Mar 6, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Self-Preferencing
Feb 26, 2025 by
CPI
Platform Self-Preferencing: Focusing the Policy Debate
Feb 26, 2025 by
Michael Katz
Weaponized Opacity: Self-Preferencing in Digital Audience Measurement
Feb 26, 2025 by
Thomas Hoppner & Philipp Westerhoff
Self-Preferencing: An Economic Literature-Based Assessment Advocating a Case-By-Case Approach and Compliance Requirements
Feb 26, 2025 by
Patrice Bougette & Frederic Marty
Self-Preferencing in Adjacent Markets
Feb 26, 2025 by
Muxin Li