Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
The Japan Fair Trade Commission (JFTC) is reportedly preparing to take action against Google for violating the country’s antitrust laws, as reported by Nikkei Asia. According to Reuters, the competition watchdog is anticipated to issue a cease-and-desist order requiring Google to put an end to its monopolistic practices.
The investigation into Google’s activities began last October, with the JFTC examining the tech giant’s compliance with Japan’s antimonopoly regulations, particularly in the area of web search services. This move aligns with similar actions taken by regulatory bodies in Europe and other major economies, as they seek to address concerns over Google’s market dominance.
Google’s Chrome browser, widely regarded as the most popular in the world, plays a central role in the company’s business strategy. By collecting user data through the browser, Google enhances its ability to deliver targeted advertising, a cornerstone of its profitability.
Read more: Perplexity Caught in Crossfire as DOJ and Google Battle Over Search Dominance
The reported findings by the JFTC come amid mounting global scrutiny of Google’s business practices. Just last month, the U.S. Department of Justice argued in court that Google, owned by Alphabet, should divest its Chrome browser and face a five-year ban from re-entering the browser market. The U.S. government’s position highlights concerns about Google’s control over the search market and its implications for fair competition.
As of now, neither Google nor the JFTC has responded to requests for comment on the potential ruling, per Reuters. The looming decision by Japan’s competition authority could set a precedent for how the nation regulates technology giants and addresses monopolistic behavior.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Supreme Court Declines to Hear Realtors’ Appeal, DOJ Antitrust Probe Moves Forward
Jan 13, 2025 by
CPI
Commerzbank Chairman Doubts Amicable Merger with UniCredit After Stake Acquisition
Jan 13, 2025 by
CPI
Senator Warren Presses HUD Nominee on Rent Price-Fixing
Jan 13, 2025 by
CPI
Epic Games CEO Accuses Tech Giants of Shifting Loyalties to Court Trump Administration
Jan 13, 2025 by
CPI
Apple’s New Developer Fees Face Renewed Scrutiny from EU Antitrust Regulators
Jan 13, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand